Strange, but does anyone find it disconcerting that Al Qaeda only launches a terror attack if it benefits defense companies that are beneficiaries of GOP pork barrel funds?
By: Ringo Bones
Ever since Al Qaeda gained global prominence after the September 11, 2001 terror attacks – even though they are already gained infamy on the failed World Trade Center bombing of 1993 and the tragic US Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania back in 1998 – thinking folks had been beating their brows almost raw over why Al Qaeda never launched a terror attack that doesn’t benefit defense firms that are primary beneficiaries of US Republican Party pork barrel. This idea might just be another one of those sexy conspiracy theories, but it did gain credence of plausibility – namely the recent crackdown by Syrian strongman Bashar Al Assad on the unarmed opposition in the town of Homs.
Notice how the Afghan Taliban got up in arms over the inadvertent burning of the Qur’an by American service personnel stationed in Afghanistan and yet the Afghan Taliban never ever issued a single fashionable Fatwa calling for the death of Syrian strongman Bashar Al Assad? Same as for the global savvy Al Qaeda who seem to forgot to launch a Fatwa on Bashar Al Assad despite of a year’s worth of wholesale genocide on Sunni Muslims who oppose his rule. Stranger still, the Afghan Taliban and Al Qaeda also never issued a Fatwa on the People’s Republic of China and Russia for preventing the United Nations from initiating steps to end the bloodshed in Syria inflicted on unarmed civilians. This is one strange conspiracy indeed.