Did Vladimir Putin Have An Ulterior Motive In Shooting Down The Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17?

Even though an international investigation team has yet to prove this, does Russian President Vladimir Putin have an actual ulterior motive in the shootdown incident of the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17? 

By: Ringo Bones

Although the jury is still out on the extent of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s responsibility on the shootdown of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 Boeing 777 back in July 18, 2014 over the pro-Russia separatists controlled part of the Ukraine, many conspiracy theorists with a “liberal streak” around the world are already in a heavy discussion whether or not Putin have an “ulterior motive” in the downing of this particular civilian airliner. And given Putin’s recent rhetoric only sends him down a rabbit hole that could send him to The Hague to face war crimes charges anyone closely following world events could now safely conjecture if the downing of the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 Boeing 777 is serving a means of Putin’s political ends? 

Given Russian President Vladimir Putin’s declaration of war on Russia’s LGBT community and this probably includes anyone not adhering to a “white-Anglo-Saxon-Protestant-work-ethic” lifestyle – i.e. Bohemians / hippies, many now wonder if Putin’s hatred of the LGBT community – Russian and the rest of the world – could have him lead to do the “unthinkable”. As in assassinate a group of leading HIV / AIDS researchers on board the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 using the “Fog of War” of the unrest in Eastern Ukraine as a cover. Given that the death of leading HIV / AIDS researcher Dr. Joep Lange and 100 of the world’s other leading HIV / AIDS researchers could set back a search of a more effective and lower cost cure / drug regimen for HIV / AIDS for decades, would killing this group be a strong political statement of Vladimir Putin being sent tot the Russian and the world’s LGBT community? Given Putin’s “Medieval” view of the LGBT community, there might be some truth to this. 

On the assignment of blame on the shootdown of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 Boeing 777, a recent text message between two pro-Russian separatist militiamen in Eastern Ukraine named “Greek” and “Major” had revealed a plausible “screw-up” on the use of their captured BUK surface-to-air missile. The intercepted and transcribed text message conversation between the two pro-Russia militiamen seem to lead credence on President Putin’s complicity of the shootdown of Flight MH17 that could lead him to be put on trial in The Hague to face war crimes charges.  

Did Israel’s Mossad Assassinated US President John F. Kennedy?

If Oliver Stone’s cinematic opus JFK failed to fully convince everyone on the conspiracy of the “military-industrial-complex and the US government personnel tasked to protect the then US President Kennedy, did the Israeli Mossad the obvious overlooked suspect of JFK’s assassination 50 years ago? 

By: Ringo Bones 

It seems like the complicity of the state of Israel in the “conspiracy” behind the assassination of then US President John F. Kennedy back in November 22, 1963 seems largely overlooked by mainstream tenured historians and “big-wig” conspiracy buffs. After all, the then fledgling state of Israel did have some very legitimate reasons to “take out” President Kennedy during his visit to Dallas, Texas back in that fateful day of November 22, 1963 – where everyone old enough to remember who are still alive to this very day will never forget where they are and what they are doing at the time when they heard the news that JFK was assassinated. 

It now barely registers on the consciousness radar of self-styled JFK assassination conspiracy buffs that back in 1961 when President Kennedy was freshly voted and inaugurated into the US Presidency. Kennedy vetoed a bill that would allow supporters of state of Israel in the Capitol Hill – i.e. pro AIPAC Republicans – to start their own clandestine nuclear weapons program. President Kennedy signed it into law that forbade the federal government to send nuclear weapons starting material that would allow the state of Israel to start their own clandestine nuclear weapons program – as in manufacture in secret either weapons-grade uranium-235 or plutonium-239 that would never be found out by the IAEA. Even though it wasn’t until 1968 that an international nuclear weapons non proliferation treaty – i.e. Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty or NPT – as far back as 1961, the United States government was already spearheading an internationally binding agreement that would prevent the spread of nuclear weapons – especially to less-than-democratic states. 

Was Lee Harvey Oswald merely a patsy as a still unnamed and unseen by the now iconic Abraham Zapruder footage – the Mossad operative hiding in the now infamous “grassy knoll” that took the fatal shot that took out President Kennedy on that fateful morning of November 22, 1963? Or was the “Mossad operative” on that Grassy Knoll wearing a Ghillie Suit? Well, the Model 1891 Mannlicher-Carcano 6.5mm X 52mm rifle that Oswald used in shooting President Kennedy was later found out by the warren Commission during the course of the investigation that it was not sighted properly and had to be readjusted before firearms tests could be conducted. And the “weapons system” used by Lee Harvey Oswald is not much of a rifle and not much of a cartridge by top-tier professional assassin standards as Oswald was doubtlessly shooting old European made military ammunition.  Or did the Mossad operative who did shoot President Kennedy used a sniper weapons system that fires the 6.5mm X 52mm round but with a way better lower receiver than your stock Mannlicher-Carcano rifle? 

But, as everyone closely following the facts behind the assassination of JFK, Oswald only had a 50-yard shot. A competent shooter – even a licensed civilian gun owner who hunts and shoots recreationally on weekends – with a well-maintained Colt M-1911A semi automatic pistol could easily have hit JFK in the head from Lee Harvey Oswald’s vantage-point in the window of that now notorious Texas Book Depository Building. Though a few years ago I have managed to hit a half-silhouetted target from 50-yards away from an elevated position using a well-maintained 1950s era Smith & Wesson revolver, does this mean that Lee Harvey Oswald had more than luck on his side to have successfully shot President John F. Kennedy back then? 

According to Oliver Stone in his cinematic opus JFK – President John F. Kennedy was allegedly done to death by the military-industrial-complex while aided and abetted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the United States Secret Service and the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency. Why the Catholic Church was left out by “prosecutor Stone” given that back then President Kennedy was frequently engaged in extra-marital trysts – I don’t know. Possibly it was an honest oversight and after all, we were, as a society, very “Politically Incorrect” during the early 1960s. Yet, a lot more “well-informed speculation” has been surmised about the JFK Assassination since Steve Weston “self-published” his book titled Woodrow Wilson and the Death of John Kennedy through Barnes & Noble and Borders back in 1998.  

But what about the “conspiracy” behind assassination attempt of President Ronald Reagan back in 1981 – was John Hinckley, Jr. just a "patsy" of the Military-Industrial-Complex? The fact is President John F. Kennedy was a proverbial godsend to the US Military Industrial Complex because during the Kennedy Administration, 31 Lafayette Class ballistic missile submarines were authorized and / or built plus Kennedy’s promise of sending a man to the Moon before the 1960s decade is out benefitted major American defense companies during the Apollo program. By contrast, during the first four years of the Reagan Administration, only 3 new ballistic missile submarines were authorized. Might we believe that the “military-industrial-complex” was behind John Hinckley, Jr.?     

Was Al Qaeda Created by the US Republican Party?

Strange, but does anyone find it disconcerting that Al Qaeda only launches a terror attack if it benefits defense companies that are beneficiaries of GOP pork barrel funds?

By: Ringo Bones

Ever since Al Qaeda gained global prominence after the September 11, 2001 terror attacks – even though they are already gained infamy on the failed World Trade Center bombing of 1993 and the tragic US Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania back in 1998 – thinking folks had been beating their brows almost raw over why Al Qaeda never launched a terror attack that doesn’t benefit defense firms that are primary beneficiaries of US Republican Party pork barrel. This idea might just be another one of those sexy conspiracy theories, but it did gain credence of plausibility – namely the recent crackdown by Syrian strongman Bashar Al Assad on the unarmed opposition in the town of Homs.

Notice how the Afghan Taliban got up in arms over the inadvertent burning of the Qur’an by American service personnel stationed in Afghanistan and yet the Afghan Taliban never ever issued a single fashionable Fatwa calling for the death of Syrian strongman Bashar Al Assad? Same as for the global savvy Al Qaeda who seem to forgot to launch a Fatwa on Bashar Al Assad despite of a year’s worth of wholesale genocide on Sunni Muslims who oppose his rule. Stranger still, the Afghan Taliban and Al Qaeda also never issued a Fatwa on the People’s Republic of China and Russia for preventing the United Nations from initiating steps to end the bloodshed in Syria inflicted on unarmed civilians. This is one strange conspiracy indeed.

Is There An Osama Bin Laden Conspiracy?

Given that the facts surrounding the taking out of Osama Bin Laden that Washington had divulged to the public at large had been deemed “nebulous” by conspiracy buffs, is there really is an Osama Bin Laden conspiracy?

By: Ringo Bones

The truth may be out there – according to Chris Carter – but the crappy conspiracy theories had been multiplying like lemmings from conspiracy buffs highly critical of the Obama administration. The May 1, 2011 Operation Geronimo that allowed the US Navy SEAL Team VI to successfully take out Osama Bin Laden – the mastermind of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks that was dubbed as the 21st Century’s Pearl Harbor had made American’s jubilant a little over half a year ago and had made President Obama’s 10th Anniversary celebration of the 9/11 attacks much less awkward in comparison to the observances of previous years. But is there really a conspiracy behind the killing of Bin Laden as some conspiracy buffs have you believe that Bin laden already died in December 23, 2001 via the relentless bombings of the Tora Bora cave system during Operation Anaconda?

Many conspiracy buffs cite the alleged rigged crash of a Blackhawk helicopter that killed 30 US Navy SEAL personnel with first-hand knowledge of Operation Geronimo a few months after they killed Osama Bin Laden. The truth may still be out there to make really form an opinion that’s an absolute polar opposite of what the White House or the spooks at Langley have us to believe, but so far, all conspiracy theories being circulated have failed the Occam Razor test.

Paul McCartney: The First Beatle to Pass Away?

Even though it is already common knowledge that the first Beatle to pass away was John Lennon via an assassin’s bullet, is there truth behind the rumor saying that Paul McCartney was the first Beatle to pass away?


By: Ringo Bones


As an eight-year-old back then, I am already old enough to know that the Beatles – either as a group or as solo artists - were one of the best musicians in the Western world months before John Lennon’s tragic assassination back in December 10, 1980. Fast forward to 2008 and I accidentally stumbled upon a rather “wacky” conspiracy on the Internet saying that the first of the Fab Four to have passed away was supposedly Paul McCartney. Given that this is such an extraordinary claim that truly demands extraordinary proof, is there really truth in this “conspiracy”?

According to the claim, the “real” Paul McCartney supposedly died back in 1966 and was supposedly since replaced by a very uncanny look-alike. The clues are supposedly – and blatantly – evident all over their iconic Abbey Road album. But is the truth really that self-evident or is it just a very elaborate hoax that’s very hard to either prove or disprove?

When the 40th Anniversary of the Beatles’ Abbey Road album was celebrated back in August 2009, the “Paul McCartney 1966 Death Rumor” conspiracy probably rekindled every Beatle-Maniac’s curiosity about the subject. The iconic album cover was credited to an Abbey Road Studios photographer named Ian McMillan who took the famous photo on a step ladder in the middle of Abbey Road.

McMillan took 6 photos and the one which was chosen for the iconic album cover was photo number 5, thus turning a merely utilitarian zebra crossing of the City of Westminster near the Abbey Road Studios into a prime Beatle-Mania pilgrimage site. In spite of the fact that Abbey Road Studios was more than the Beatles though, scores of other musicians – including scores of Classical Music orchestras and ensembles – had recorded there since the Golden Age of Stereo. Beatle Maniacs and “mere” tourists can even sign their “I was here” graffiti on the wall outside of the famed recording studio.

So did Beatle Paul McCartney really die in 1966 and the proof is there to see in the photos of the Abbey Road album cover? Well, it was so many years ago today that a cold case such as these will be very difficult to solve just by publicity photos used in an album cover alone. If it really is true, then Yoko Ono probably has nothing to do with the breaking up of the Beatles.

Should Wikileaks Be Taken Seriously?

The website was supposedly set up as a safe place for wistleblowers to air out their incriminating evidence for legal scrutiny, should anything posted on Wikileaks be taken seriously?


By: Ringo Bones


Even after the furor of the 90,000 or so leaked documents highlighting the shortcomings of the Bush Administration era War on Terror inexorably died down (has it?), the whistleblowing site Wikileaks had now indisputably become the conspiracy fetishists conversation piece du jour. Though it only confirmed everyone’s concerns on everything that’s wrong with the Bush Administration era War on Terror, it gained a little more air of authenticity after that inexplicably still-born rape and child molestation lawsuit against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Are rattled intelligence agency personnel resorting to Roman Polanski-style intimidation for damage control?

Ever since that incriminating Abu Ghraib Prison scandal photos have been posted on the Internet and “fall-person” US Army Specialist Lynndie England got branded the title moniker of a “sexually-depraved torturer” by the world’s major news providers, on-line whisleblowing on the irregularities of the Bush Administration’s War on Terror finally got the much-needed press attention that it deserve. Worse still, the subsequent whistleblowing incidents only confirmed the rest of the civilized world’s suspicions of the Bush-Cheney run War on Terror as a legitimizing platform of American lunatic fringe organized Christianity that sincerely believes via their religious doctrine that the United Nations and the Geneva Convention are the work of The Devil.

While the gist of the 90,000 or so Afghan theatre of the War on Terror that got Wikileaks founder Julian Assange in trouble centers around the under-reporting of civilian casualties killed by both the Coalition Forces and the Taliban. The under-reporting of incidences of IED (Improvised Explosive Devices) attack, not to mention the Taliban’s not-so-oft mentioned access to man-portable surface-to-air missiles. And the most damning of all is the Pakistan’s Intelligence Agency or ISI colluding with the Afghan Taliban. The Pakistan government’s “rumoured” collusion with the Afghan Taliban probably dates back as far as when Zia Ul-Haq ruled Pakistan deciding to solve the Kashmir problem by whatever means necessary.

Even if the authenticity of most of the leaked documents are yet to be confirmed, an overwhelming majority of the documents seems to be in congruence to the criticisms of those intimately involved with the Bush-era War on Terror. Add to that majority of the world’s population already fed up with their respective governments deciding what kind of information the masses supposedly can handle – and deciding what’s our best interest is. Maybe Julian Assange was right when he said: “Without the truth, no public policy is coherent”.

Are US Government Buildings Equipped With Self-destruct Mechanisms?

Given that the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building bombing of 1995 and the Tower 7 collapse during the 9 / 11 terror attacks have “strange” forensic results, does this prove that US Government buildings have self-destruct mechanisms?


By: Ringo Bones


A lot of conspiracy theories had emerged in the wake of the September 11, 2001 Terror Attacks that range from the seriously anti-Semitic to the just plain silly. And like most levelheaded folks, I just tend to subscribe the ones that have withstood the scrutiny of Occam’s Razor. Strange as it may seem, but have you ever wondered if US Government buildings – like most of the US DoD’s strategically sensitive technologies – are equipped with self-destruct mechanism?

Let’s take a look back to that tragic Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building bombing in Oklahoma City back in April 19, 1995. Back then, the reality is that Christian extremists – like in the movie Arlington Road – are the terrorists before being relegated to the footnote of history by Islamic extremists in the wake of the 9 / 11 attacks. The FBI soon after managed to capture the mastermind of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building bombing, but the official findings of the Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee produced high-level detractors.

Like Neutron Bomb inventor Sam Cohen and Brig. Gen. Benton Partin (ret.) who have serious doubts of the official findings after the actual forensics of the crime scene doesn’t seem to jibe with the investigation committee’s consensus. Like the seismographic evidence showing that there were more than one bomb that took down the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building back in April 19, 1995 was inexplicably left out.

Another US Government building that collapsed under very strange circumstances was Tower 7, the third building that collapsed during the September 11, 2001 Terror Attacks – after the twin towers of the World Trade Center building. Inexplicably, Tower 7 was never mentioned in the 9 / 11 Commission. To conspiracy buffs, Tower 7 became the fodder for their political views because this US Government building is well known for storing key files about ENRON era corporate fraud. Stranger still, the thermal imaging-equipped NASA reconnaissance plane that flew over Ground Zero 5 days after the September 11 attacks shows that the ground where Tower 7 used to stand was still hot despite of the 5 days firefighters spraying water and other fire suppressants on that particular spot.

The Louizeaux family owned Controlled Demolitions Incorporated, headed by Mark Louizeaux unfortunately got embroiled in the Tower 7 conspiracy because they sided with the official – then Bush Administration era - US Government findings of the Tower 7 collapse. While remaining tight-lipped when asked by the anomalous forensic evidence surrounding the building’s collapse.

Given that Mark Louizeaux’s business is very dependent of the federal government, nobody will ever see him as an unbiased witness when it comes to the Tower 7-collapse issue. Conspiracy buffs even accuse him of receiving US Government contracts of rigging the top secret self-destruct mechanisms of their various buildings. Specifically the kind that protects the key files about corporate fraud stored in Tower 7 from falling into the hands of unauthorized persons. But is this undeniable proof that US Government buildings are equipped with self-destruct mechanisms so that their sensitive documents won’t fall into unauthorized hands?

Destruction of strategically sensitive US Government documents to prevent them from falling into enemy hands is reminiscent of Executive Order 11490 and Executive Order 11921 assigning the US Postal Service responsibility to burn stamps to prevent their falling into enemy hands. If explosive-type self-destruct mechanisms were indeed installed in US Government Buildings, shouldn’t they be made “bomb proof” to prevent accidental detonation in case of a terrorist bomb attack? Maybe their creators and installers forgot to, thus the anomalous forensic evidence that keeps cropping out of bombed US Government buildings.